![]() |
| Ashafa |
Twitting on the issue, the Speaker described the
report as “barefaced lies”. He said there was no provision for the project on
the budget, calling on those with contrary information to come up with
evidence.
Reports of the project removal flooded the Internet on
Sunday, triggering a widespread controversy. Many social media users blamed the
lawmakers for allegedly replacing it with their constituency projects.
Dogara, a conservative social media user, had earlier
abstained from the online debate. He, however, delved into it in the early
hours of Monday, making use of his Twitter page to give his position.
Social media activists had demanded an explanation
from the Speaker on the decision to delete the project from the budget. For instance, tweeting on @demola_ade77, one
Alabi Ojo called on him to explain why the key infrastructure would not receive
a deserved priority.
Responding to Ojo and others, Dogara said Nigerians
had failed to ask the right questions. The masses, he said, should have asked
whether the project was included in the expenditure template before attacking
NASS on social media.
To a tweeter, who challenged the Speaker to publish
the presentation of the Minister of Transport, Chibuike Amaechi, during the
budget defence session, Dogara said, “Ameachi does not have any constitutional
power to prepare a budget estimate and lay the same before NASS.”
According to him, those who claim the parliament
removed or substituted the rail project may have got their information from the
beer parlour.
The number four citizen in the country asked, “Who in
the Presidency said so? The presidential spokesman or the Minister of
Information?
“I guess (this is) from the beer parlour, as any
reasonable man claiming so should have given hard evidence.”
He said the misinformation had nothing to do with the
Presidency, but an intentional lie “meant to stir hatred.”
Dogara is not alone in employing digital tools to
defend NASS against the allegation. The
Chairman, the House Committee on Appropriation, Abdulmumin Jibrin, has been on
Twitter since Sunday, for the same reason.
In a series of tweets, Jibrin said, “The Lagos-Calabar
rail was never captured in the budget that transmitted to NASS. How then did
the NASS remove it? I actually find it shocking that even some national dailies
made the removal their headlines. A little research would have helped.
“All they, those spreading the false information,
needed to have done were to check the initial document sent by the executive…
The Ministry of Transportation overshot its budget by N54bn. That is, by the
time you add up the items on the ministry’s budget, you would still have a gap
of N54bn. N54bn lying there without being allocated.”
Yet, Jibrin pointed out that the constitution gave
lawmakers powers to re-allocate, remove, add or increase items on the
appropriation.
“The constitution is explicitly clear. The role of the
President in the preparation of budget is to send estimates while NASS has
powers to allocate, re-allocate, remove, add, increase, reduce or retain
revenue and expenditure item.”
Senators Godwill Akpabio, Ben Murray-Bruce and other
lawmakers from the South-South have been singled out for an online attack over
the issue.
Murray-Bruce said, “The only reason behind the lie… is
to set Nigerians against each other.”
Interestingly, the post by Chairman of the Senate
Committee on Land Transport, Gbenga Ashafa, may have contradicted the position
of other lawmakers. Posting on his Facebook wall on Monday, he said the project
was not in the original document but that it was included in the supplementary
copy Amaechi sent during ministerial budget defence.
He noted, “Amaechi did inform the committee of the omission
of the Lagos-Calabar rail modernisation and indeed sent a supplementary copy of
the ministry’s budget to the committee, which contained the said project.
“The minister noted that the amount needed for the
counterpart funding for both the Lagos to Kano and Lagos to Calabar rail
modernisation projects was in the sum of N120bn, being N60bn each. While the
committee did not completely agree with all the changes made in the subsequent
document, we keyed into the laudable rail modernisation project and found ways
of appropriating funds for it without exceeding the envelope provided for the
ministry.”
He said the disputed project was included in the
document his committee sent to the Senate Committee on Appropriation, adding
that the unallocated N54bn reportedly found in the Ministry of Transport’s
budget was for Lagos-Kano and Lagos-Calabar rail projects.

No comments:
Post a Comment